Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Review
  • Open Access

Apc-related models of intestinal neoplasia: a brief review for pathologists

Surgical and Experimental Pathology20192:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42047-019-0036-9

  • Received: 6 March 2019
  • Accepted: 26 March 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Rodent models of intestinal cancer are widely used as preclinical models for human colorectal carcinoma and have proven useful in many experimental contexts, including elucidation of basic pathways of carcinogenesis and in chemoprevention studies. One of the earliest genetically engineered mouse models of intestinal cancer is the ApcMin/+ mouse, which has been used for over 25 years. This model carriers a mutation in the Apc gene, which is responsible for the inherited colon cancer syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis coli, in humans. In this review, we discuss the pathologic features of ApcMin/+-type intestinal adenomas and carcinomas, and compare them to the analogous human lesions. Pitfalls of assessment of histopathology of the mouse such as non-invasive mucosal herniation in prolapse are also described.

Keywords

  • Genetically engineered mice
  • intestinal neoplasms
  • Apc
  • disease models
  • Min
  • colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal carcinoma is a common cause of cancer mortality in the Western world. In many pathology practices, colorectal adenomas removed during screening colonoscopies constitute a high percentage of the daily workload, and thus the morphology of human colorectal carcinoma and adenomas, its precursor lesions, is familiar to surgical pathologists. In academic centers, surgical pathologists may be asked to interpret mouse models of neoplasia for investigators, and a basic understanding of similarities and differences between the morphology of human intestinal neoplasia and mouse models is necessary for accurate interpretation.

Genetically altered mouse models of tumorigenesis, while sometimes criticized for their imperfect modeling of human disease, are useful in assessing whether specific mutations can lead to tumor formation, for chemoprevention studies and for elucidating functionality of altered gene products. While there are many genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models of intestinal neoplasia described in the scientific literature, they can be broadly divided into 5 groups: Apc-related models with alterations in Wnt signaling, mismatch repair deficient models, carcinogen-treated models, models with alterations in transforming growth factor β, and colitis-associated neoplasia arising in immune-deficient models such as IL10−/− mice. This review will focus on the pathology of one of the first GEM models of intestinal neoplasia, the ApcMin+/− mouse and related models, with the goal of describing the morphologic features of the intestinal lesions, with comparison to human colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

One of the most widely used models for human intestinal neoplasia is the ApcMin+/− model, developed in 1990 in the laboratory of William Dove (Moser et al., 1990). The ApcMin+/− mouse, the first germline mutant mouse model of intestinal neoplasia, carries an autosomal dominant loss of function mutation at Apc codon 850 generated by exposure to N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), a highly potent mutagen. A number of other models with Apc mutation, many with truncating mutations, have since been generated (Table 1).
Table 1

ApcMin+/ and selected related genetically altered mouse models of intestinal neoplasia

Model

Predominant Tumor Locations

Neoplasm

Average number of tumors per mouse

Other lesions

Reference

Apc Min+ /−

Small intestine > colon

Adenoma

30

 

Moser et al. 1990 (Moser et al., 1995)

Apc 1638N/+

Small intestine and colon; more in colon compared to ApcMin+/−

Adenoma, carcinoma; rarely, liver metastasis (Fodde et al., 1994)

4 (10-fold reduction over ApcMin+/)

Fibromatosis (desmoid tumors); gastric carcinoma, duodenal adenomas, cutaneous cysts

Fodde et al. 1994 (Fodde et al., 1994)

Apc Δ716/+

Small intestine > colon

Adenoma

254 (10-fold increase over ApcMin+/)

 

Oshima et al. 1995 (Oshima et al., 1995)

Apc 1309/+

Small intestine

Adenoma

34

 

Quesada et al. 1998 (Quesada et al., 1998)

ΔN131 β-catenin

Small intestine

Adenoma

1

Polycystic kidneys

Romagnolo et al. 1999 (Romagnolo et al., 1999)

Apc Δ474

Small intestine > colon

Adenoma

122, small intestine; 1.4 in large intestine

Adenomas in duodenum, stomach, mammary gland

Sasai et al., 2000 (Sasai et al., 2000)

Apc 1322T

Small intestine (location shifted towards proximal small intestine)

Adenoma, some with high grade dysplasia

192, small intestine; 2, large intestine

Gastric adenomas

Pollard et al., 2009 (Pollard et al., 2009)

Apc 580S

Not applicable

None

None

No phenotype without further manipulation

Shibata et al., 1997 (Shibata et al., 1997)

Apc Δ15/+

Small intestine > colon

Adenoma, some with high grade dysplasia; adenocarcinoma

176, small intestine; 8.3, large intestine

 

Robanus-Maandag et al., 2010 (Robanus-Maandag et al., 2010)

FabplCre;Apc15lox/+

Colon> small intestine

Adenoma, 17% with high grade dysplasia; adenocarcinoma (18% of lesions)

14.9, small intestine; 25.6, large intestine

 

Robanus-Maandag et al., 2010 (Robanus-Maandag et al., 2010)

Apc 1576

Not applicable

None

None

Multifocal breast neoplasia, trichogenic skin tumors, osteomas mimicking Gardner syndrome

Toki et al. 2013 (Toki et al., 2013)

Apc Δ14/+

Distal colon and rectum

Adenomas and carcinomas (50% of lesions)

36, conventional housing; 65, specific pathogen-free conditions

Mammary gland tumors; rectal prolapse

Colnot et al. 2014 (Colnot et al., 2004)

These Apc-related models are particularly useful because the most common driver mutation for colorectal carcinoma in humans is mutation in the tumor suppressor gene APC, leading to inactivation of APC and activation of the Wnt signaling pathway, with stabilization of β-catenin and its translocation of to the nucleus. The APC gene in humans encodes a 213 kilodalton protein involved in cell adhesion and motility, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and signal transduction (Boman & Fields, 2013), and its germline mutation results in familial adenomatosis polyposis coli (FAP). This cancer predisposition syndrome is characterized by the development of hundreds of colorectal adenomas, leading to adenocarcinoma at a young age. Most mutations causing FAP are within the 5′ half of the gene and result in truncated polypeptides.

Genetics of APC-related animal models

Many of the Apc-related mouse models have been engineered to contain germline mutations in Apc that lead to expression of a truncated Apc protein; in most of these models, only heterozygotes are viable, as homozygosity is embryonic lethal. Loss of growth control upon loss of the remaining wild type copy of Apc leads to multiple intestinal adenomas. The specific location of the Apc mutation affects polyp multiplicity, location, and longevity of the mice (McCart et al., 2008). For example, the Apc1638N/+ mouse has a reduced polyp burden and longer lifespan compared to the ApcMin/+ mouse (Smits et al., 1998), In the Apc1322T mouse, the mutant protein retains one 20-amino acid β-catenin binding/degradation repeat (in the ApcMin/+, there are none); adenomas in these mice are detectable earlier, have more severe dysplasia, and are larger (Pollard et al., 2009) compared to ApcMin/+ mice. Timing of Apc loss of function may also be important; for instance, step-wise Apc loss using Apc(Min/CKO) or Apc(1638N/CKO) results in grossly visible neoplasia in the intestine, while simultaneous loss leads to occult clonal expansion through crypt fission without morphologic transformation (Fischer et al., 2012). Deletion of the entire Apc gene in the ApcΔel-15 mouse yields more rapid tumor development compared to Apc truncation, with decreased survival, more severe polyposis, and more advanced colon tumors progression compared to ApcMin/+ mice (Cheung et al., 2010).

Genetically altered rat models with Apc mutation are also available and are appealing based on the longevity of the models and the relative ease of performing colonoscopy, allowing for longitudinal experiments (Table 2). The most common are the Kyoto Apc Delta (KAD) rat and the Pirc rat. The KAD rat was derived via ENU mutagenesis and has a nonsense mutation in at codon 2523 in exon 15 of Apc, yielding a truncated protein. These rats are viable in the homozygous state and do not develop intestinal tumors spontaneously. Treatment with azoxymethane and dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS) is necessary to induce intestinal neoplasia. The Pirc rat, also produced via ENU-induced mutagenesis, has an Apc mutation at nucleotide 3409, producing a truncated protein. This mutation is embyronic lethal in the homozygote state. The mutation has 100% penetrance, with all rats developing colon polyps after age 4 months.
Table 2

Apc-related models, other species

Model

Predominant Tumor Locations

Neoplasm

Average number of tumors per animal

Other lesions

Reference

ApcPirc/+ (rat)

Small intestine and large intestine

Adenoma, carcinoma

Small intestine: 1.5 to 22; large intestine: 7 to 26; depending on strain and sex.

odontomas

Amos-Landgraf et al., 2007 (Amos-Landgraf et al., 2007); Irving et al. 2014 (Irving et al., 2014)

Kyoto Apc Delta (KAD) (rat)

Colon (requires AOM/DSS treatment)

Treatment with AOM/DSS induces colorectal adenocarcinoma, invasive into submucosa

9.5, males; 5.8, females

 

Yoshima et al., 2009 (Yoshimi et al., 2009); Irving et al. 2014 (Irving et al., 2014)

APC1311/+ (pig)

Colon

Adenoma, some with high grade dysplasia

> 100

 

Flisikowska et al., 2012 (Flisikowska et al., 2012)

A genetically altered pig model carrying an APC 1311 mutation, orthologous to human APC 1309, has been developed. These animal develop aberrant crypt foci, single crypt adenomas, and multiple colorectal adenomas, similar to human FAP. The larger adenomas exhibit progression in the form of high grade dysplasia. Surface involvement, similar to human adenomas (Flisikowska et al., 2012), is characteristic.

Modifiers of Cancer Phenotypes

Strain differences have long been recognized as having a significant effect on the tumor burden in the ApcMin+/− model, which is usually maintained on a C57Bl/6J background. Crossing of B6 Min/+ mice to AKR and other inbred strains resulted in a decrease in average tumor number in the F1 mice (Shoemaker et al., 1997). Backcrossing experiments and other genetic analyses to map modifier loci have yielded a number of Modifier of Min (Mom) candidate genes (McCart et al., 2008). In addition, diet and intestinal microbiome of the mouse colony have important effects on polyp multiplicity, progression, and size. For instance, a high fat-low fiber western-style diet has been shown to increase polyp numbers and tumor progression in ApcΔ716/+ mice (Hioki et al., 1997).

Pathology

The morphology of intestinal lesions in ApcMin+/−and related models is similar across the models although the age of onset, degree of dysplasia, and distribution in the gastrointestinal tract varies (Table 1). The earliest recognizable lesions consist of a single enlarged crypt or small cluster of crypts lined by crowded cells with increased nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and nuclear hyperchromasia (Fig. 1). These early lesions are low grade dysplastic lesions similar to small tubular colonic adenomas seen in patients with FAP. In the small intestine, a small invagination develops in the lamina propria in the proliferative zone at the junction of the crypt and villus (Fig. 2). The adenomatous cells push into the lamina propria and up into the villus, forming a double layer of adenomatous epithelium underneath a normal surface mucosa (Fig. 3). In the colon, the early adenomas invaginate into the lamina propria between crypts, although single crypt adenomas may also be identified (Oshima et al., 1997). Immunohistochemistry for beta catenin can be used to help identify early adenomas, as even single crypt adenomas in ApcMin+/− and related models display accumulation of nuclear beta catenin (Fig. 4).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

A small adenoma in colonic mucosa in an Apc1638N/+ mouse, similar to human colorectal adenomas. Note the increased nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio and hyperchromatic, crowded pencillate nuclei

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

A single adenomatous crypt in the small intestine of an ApcMin/+ mouse, composed of a dilated cystic invagination into the villu

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Adenomas in ApcMin/+ and related models are often covered by a single layer of normal overlying epithelium, unlike in human colorectal adenomas, where the surface mucosa is usually involved by adenomatous epithelium

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Immunohistochemistry for beta catenin in ApcMin/+ and related models is useful in identifying small single crypt adenomas, which show loss of the normal membranous pattern and accumulation of beta catenin in the nucleus due to alterations in Wnt signaling

As the adenomas grow, they form polypoid, pedunculated or sometimes cup-shaped lesions with a depressed center (Fig. 5a and b). In many models, the adenomas do not progress beyond low grade dysplasia. However, in longer-lived models with fewer tumors, some develop high grade dysplasia characterized by cribriform architecture, in which not all cells are in contact with a basement membrane (Fig. 6). Numerous mitotic Figures and apoptotic bodies are common in adenomas at all stages of development.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a Small intestinal adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice push into the intervillus spaces as they grow. Note preservation of normal epithelium over much of the adenoma. b A pedunculated colonic adenoma in an Apc1638N/+ mouse

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

High grade dysplasia, characterized by cribriform architecture, in an Apc1638N/+ adenoma

The intestinal neoplasms arising in ApcMin+/− and related models contain multiple cells types but are primarily composed of absorptive type cells and goblet cells (Table 3). Adenomas arising in the small intestine of in the ApcMin+/− and related models contain Paneth cells that are easily identified on hematoxylin and eosin stain (Fig. 7) and highlighted with immunohistochemistry for lysozyme. They are been shown to comprise 10% or less of the cells in small intestinal adenomas (Moser et al., 1992). The mouse colon does not contain Paneth cells but lysozyme-expressing cells lacking PAS positivity have been identified in colonic adenomas in these models, suggesting Paneth cell-like differentiation even in colonic lesions (Moser et al., 1992; Husoy et al., 2006). Neuroendocrine cells comprise a small proportion of the cells in ApcMin+/− type adenomas, but the specific cell type reflects the neuroendocrine cells found in normal intestinal mucosa at the site of the adenoma (Moser et al., 1992). For instance, serotonin-expressing cells are the most common neuroendocrine cells in mouse intestine and are found throughout; such cells comprise up to 5% of ApcMin+/− adenoma cells, in lesions from small bowel and colon (Moser et al., 1992). PYY-positive cells, in contrast, are found only in adenoma from the distal colon, reflecting the distribution of these cells normally. Neuroendocrine cells are diffusely scattered throughout the adenomas, and do not form small clusters as do the lysozyme-positive cells (Moser et al., 1992).
Table 3

Cell types in adenomas in ApcMin+/− and related models

Cell Type

Proportion

Absorptive cells (enterocytes, colonocytes)

Majority of cells

Goblet cells

Second most common cell type

Paneth cells

Up to 10% in small intestinal adenomas; fewer in colonic lesions

Neuroendocrine cells

Up to 5%

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Multiple cell types are present in adenomas in ApcMin/+ and related models. Here, scattered Paneth cells can be identified by their red cytoplasmic granules, and a few goblet cells are present in the adenoma. The predominant cell type is an absorptive cell

Dysplasia in intestinal adenomas in mouse models should be graded using the same terminology (low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia, intramucosal carcinoma) and criteria as for human colorectal adenomas (Washington et al., 2013). Most adenomas in the ApcMin+/− mouse and related models show low grade dysplasia but many become progressively larger as the mouse ages, and a few progress along the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Invasive carcinoma is rare, as most mice die of anemia or intussusception before progression. However, a few of the longer-lived models with fewer adenomas develop adenocarcinoma invasive into the submucosa (Colnot et al., 2004; Fodde et al., 1994; Robanus-Maandag et al., 2010). Metastasis does not occur in ApcMin+/− mice and is exceedingly rare in related models (Fodde et al., 1994).

Surgical pathologists asked to analyze intestinal specimens should be aware of a pitfall in assessing tumor invasion in mouse models. Because the layers of the mouse intestine are thin and delicate, herniation of benign epithelium into submucosa is a common occurrence (Boivin et al., 2003), especially in the setting of rectal prolapse and in inflammatory conditions (Fig. 8a and b). Similar displacement of adenomatous mucosa (pseudoinvasion) occurs in pedunculated colorectal adenomas in humans and in colitis cystica profunda. Consensus guidelines for distinguishing between herniation and invasive adenocarcinoma were developed at a Mouse Models of Intestinal Neoplasia Workshop at Jackson Laboratories in 2000 by a panel of scientists and pathologists (Boivin et al., 2003) and are summarized in Table 4. It may not be possible to diagnose invasive carcinoma with certainty, especially in inflammatory models or areas of prolapse, and evaluation of older mice with better developed lesions may be necessary for a conclusive determination of invasion.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

a Rectal prolapse in mice may mimic adenomatous change, as in humans. Here, note thickened hyperplastic reactive-appearing mucosa, with fibromuscular changes in the lamina propria. b In areas of prolapse, displacement of non-neoplastic crypts may mimic invasive adenocarcinoma. Here, a single herniated crypt is present in the submucosa. Note the rounded crypt profile and resemblance to the overlying crypts

Table 4

Features helpful in distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma from mucosal herniation (Boivin et al., 2003)

Feature

Favors Invasive Carcinoma

Favors Herniated Epithelium

Comparison with overlying mucosa

Invasive cells are different from overlying mucosa, with changes exceeding low grade dysplasia

Dysplasia is absent

Desmoplasia

Present; not associated with prominent inflammatory infiltrate.

Absent; lamina propria may exhibit fibromuscular obliterative changes in prolapse

Crypt/gland profile

Irregular, pointed, angulated crypt profiles

Rounded; may be cystically dilated

Spread relative to mucosal surface

Invading crypts spread laterally

No lateral spread from overlying mucosa.

Cell loss from leading edge

Present; crypts are incompletely lined by epithelium

Absent; crypts are completely lined by epithelial cells

Number of crypts in question

More than 2 invading crypts

Two or fewer crypts in question

Basement membrane

Discontinuous

Continuous

Findings in other mice of the same genotype

Evidence of progression to invasive cancer in other mice

No invasive cancer in other mice

Invasion into the lamina propria is characterized by the development of angular crypt profiles with individual infiltrating cells and may be accompanied stromal alterations such as desmoplasia and increased inflammatory cell density (Fig. 9a and b).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

a Invasive carcinoma may be seen in longer-lived ApcMin/+-related models. In contrast to the smooth crypt profile of herniation, the invasive adenocarcinoma shown here has an angulated profile with infiltration of tumor cells into a desmoplastic stroma. b In this example from a Apc1638N/+ mouse, adenocarcinoma cells infiltrate the lamina propria as small angulated glands with pointed profiles and elicit an inflammatory and stromal reaction

Conclusions

The ApcMin+/− mouse was developed over 25 years ago and has been reported in countless publications since that time. While the its limitations as a model for all aspects of human colorectal cancer are well recognized, ApcMin+/− and related models remain useful, particularly in analyzing the biology of Apc, phenotype-genotype modeling comparison with familial adenomatous polyposis coli, and chemopreventative studies. Given their knowledge of morphology of human disease, surgical pathologists are well suited to assess and describe the pathology of these models, but should be aware of pitfalls in the interpretations of histology changes in the mouse.

Abbreviations

APC: 

adenomatous polyposis coli

DSS: 

dextran sulfate sodium

ENU: 

N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea

FAP: 

familial adenomatous polyposis

GEM: 

genetically engineered mouse

KAD: 

Kyoto Apc Delta, AOM, azoxymethane

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

MKW is supported by the Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research Center NIH Grant DK058404.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MKW and AEDZ cowrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, C-3321 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
(2)
Institute of Molecular Biology Faculty, Science Literacy Program University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA

References

  1. Amos-Landgraf JM, Kwong LN, Kendziorski CM, Reichelderfer M, Torrealba J, Weichert J, et al. A target-selected Apc-mutant rat kindred enhances the modeling of familial human colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104(10):4036–4041. PubMed PMID: 17360473View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Boivin GP, Washington K, Yang K, Ward JM, Pretlow TP, Russell R, et al. Pathology of mouse models of intestinal cancer: consensus report and recommendations. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(3):762–777. PubMed PMID: 12612914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Boman BM, Fields JZ. An APC:WNT counter-current-like mechanism regulates cell division along the human colonic crypt axis: a mechanism that explains how apc mutations induce proliferative abnormalities that drive colon cancer development. Front Oncol 2013;3:244. PubMed PMID: 24224156Google Scholar
  4. Cheung AF, Carter AM, Kostova KK, Woodruff JF, Crowley D, Bronson RT, et al. Complete deletion of Apc results in severe polyposis in mice. Oncogene. 2010;29(12):1857–1864. PubMed PMID: 20010873. Pubmed Central PMCID: HHMIMS181538View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Colnot S, Niwa-Kawakita M, Hamard G, Godard C, Le Plenier S, Houbron C, et al. Colorectal cancers in a new mouse model of familial adenomatous polyposis: influence of genetic and environmental modifiers. Lab Investig 2004;84(12):1619–1630. PubMed PMID: 15502862View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer JM, Miller AJ, Shibata D, Liskay RM. Different phenotypic consequences of simultaneous versus stepwise Apc loss. Oncogene. 2012;31(16):2028–2038. PubMed PMID: 21892206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Flisikowska T, Merkl C, Landmann M, Eser S, Rezaei N, Cui X, et al. A porcine model of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(5):1173–5.e7. PubMed PMID: 22864254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fodde R, Edelmann W, Yang K, van Leeuwen C, Carlson C, Renault B et al (1994) A targeted chain-termination mutation in the mouse Apc gene results in multiple intestinal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91(19):8969–8973View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hioki K, Shivapurkar N, Oshima H, Alabaster O, Oshima M, Taketo MM (1997) Suppression of intestinal polyp development by low-fat and high-fiber diet in Apc(delta716) knockout mice. Carcinogenesis. 18(10):1863–1865View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Husoy T, Knutsen HK, Loberg EM, Alexander J. Intestinal adenomas of Min-mice lack enterochromaffin cells, and have increased lysozyme production in non-Paneth cells. Anticancer Res 2006;26(3A):1797–1802. PubMed PMID: 16827109Google Scholar
  11. Irving AA, Halberg RB, Albrecht DM, Plum LA, Krentz KJ, Clipson L, et al. Supplementation by vitamin D compounds does not affect colonic tumor development in vitamin D sufficient murine models. Arch Biochem Biophys 2011;515(1–2):64–71. PubMed PMID: 21907701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Irving AA, Yoshimi K, Hart ML, Parker T, Clipson L, Ford MR, et al. The utility of Apc-mutant rats in modeling human colon cancer. Dis Model Mech 2014;7(11):1215–1225. PubMed PMID: 25288683View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. McCart AE, Vickaryous NK, Silver A. Apc mice: models, modifiers and mutants. Pathol Res Pract 2008;204(7):479–490. PubMed PMID: 18538487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Moser AR, Dove WF, Roth KA, Gordon JI (1992) The Min (multiple intestinal neoplasia) mutation: its effect on gut epithelial cell differentiation and interaction with a modifier system. J Cell Biol 116(6):1517–1526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Moser AR, Luongo C, Gould KA, McNeley MK, Shoemaker AR, Dove WF. ApcMin: a mouse model for intestinal and mammary tumorigenesis. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A(7–8):1061–1064. PubMed PMID: 7576992View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Moser AR, Pitot HC, Dove WF. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science. 1990;247(4940):322–324. PubMed PMID: 2296722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Oshima H, Oshima M, Kobayashi M, Tsutsumi M, Taketo MM (1997) Morphological and Molecular Processes of Polyp Formation in ApcΔ716 Knockout Mice. Cancer Res. 57(9):1644–1649Google Scholar
  18. Oshima M, Oshima H, Kitagawa K, Kobayashi M, Itakura C, Taketo M. Loss of Apc heterozygosity and abnormal tissue building in nascent intestinal polyps in mice carrying a truncated Apc gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92(10):4482–4486. PubMed PMID: 7753829View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollard P, Deheragoda M, Segditsas S, Lewis A, Rowan A, Howarth K, et al. The Apc 1322T mouse develops severe polyposis associated with submaximal nuclear beta-catenin expression. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(7):2204–13.e1–13. PubMed PMID: 19248780View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Quesada CF, Kimata H, Mori M, Nishimura M, Tsuneyoshi T, Baba S. Piroxicam and acarbose as chemopreventive agents for spontaneous intestinal adenomas in APC gene 1309 knockout mice. Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann 1998;89(4):392–396. PubMed PMID: 9617344View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Robanus-Maandag EC, Koelink PJ, Breukel C, Salvatori DC, Jagmohan-Changur SC, Bosch CA, et al. A new conditional Apc-mutant mouse model for colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(5):946–952. PubMed PMID: 20176656View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Romagnolo B, Berrebi D, Saadi-Keddoucci S, Porteu A, Pichard AL, Peuchmaur M et al (1999) Intestinal dysplasia and adenoma in transgenic mice after overexpression of an activated β-catenin. Cancer Res 59(16):3875–3879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasai H, Masaki M, Wakitani K. Suppression of polypogenesis in a new mouse strain with a truncated Apc(Delta474) by a novel COX-2 inhibitor, JTE-522. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(5):953–958. PubMed PMID: 10783317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Shibata H, Toyama K, Shioya H, Ito M, Hirota M, Hasegawa S, et al. Rapid colorectal adenoma formation initiated by conditional targeting of the Apc gene. Science. 1997;278(5335):120–123. PubMed PMID: 9311916View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shoemaker AR, Gould KA, Luongo C, Moser AR, Dove WF. Studies of neoplasia in the Min mouse. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1332(2):F25–F48. PubMed PMID: 9141462Google Scholar
  26. Smits R, van der Houven van Oordt W, Luz A, Zurcher C, Jagmohan-Changur S, Breukel C, et al. Apc1638N: a mouse model for familial adenomatous polyposis-associated desmoid tumors and cutaneous cysts. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(2):275–283. PubMed PMID: 9453487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Toki H, Inoue M, Motegi H, Minowa O, Kanda H, Yamamoto N, et al. Novel mouse model for Gardner syndrome generated by a large-scale N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis program. Cancer Sci 2013;104(7):937–944. PubMed PMID: 23551873View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Washington MK, Powell AE, Sullivan R, Sundberg JP, Wright N, Coffey RJ, et al. Pathology of rodent models of intestinal cancer: progress report and recommendations. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(4):705–717. PubMed PMID: 23415801. Pubmed Central PMCID: NIHMS450747 PMC3660997View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yoshimi K, Tanaka T, Takizawa A, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Mashimo T et al (2009) Enhanced colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis in a novel Apc mutant rat. Cancer Sci 100(11):2022–2027View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement